Please take a moment to read this post first, i.e. "A Different Perspective," before diving into this blog. Your comments, suggestions and participation are greatly appreciated.

Please take a look at Notable Quotes, enjoy.

Please take a look at the bibliography if you do not see a proper reference to a post.

Warning, Caveat and Note: The postings on this blog are my interpretation of readings, studies and experiences therefore errors and omissions are mine and mine alone. The content surrounding the extracts of books, see bibliography on this blog site, are also mine and mine alone therefore errors and omissions are also mine and mine alone and therefore why I highly recommended one read, study, research and fact find the material for clarity. My effort here is self-clarity toward a fuller understanding of the subject matter. See the bibliography for information on the books.


Note: I will endevor to provide a bibliography and italicize any direct quotes from the materials I use for this blog. If there are mistakes, errors, and/or omissions, I take full responsibility for them as they are mine and mine alone. If you find any mistakes, errors, and/or omissions please comment and let me know along with the correct information and/or sources.


“All I say is by way of discourse, and nothing by way of advice. I should not speak so boldly if it were my due to be believed.” - Montaigne

Hey, Attention on Deck!

Hey, NOTHING here is PERSONAL, get over it - Teach Me and I will Learn!


Search This Blog

Monday, May 23, 2016

Self-Defense Domains

Blog Article/Post Caveat (Read First Please: Click the Link)

The Cornered Cat wrote an outstanding piece today (read it HERE ) on different domains as they effect firearm self-defense and that inspired me to add in that even general self-defense of empty hands, etc., also suffers from the various domains used to promote and sell self-defense where military inferences seem highest to my perception. 

She states, in short and out of context to her article,  “ … an effective and good military mindset might in fact be a dangerous and perhaps illegal mindset for a civilian … “

It really does come down to the distinctions behind the intent of an individual training for self-defense. Our mind-set has such a huge effect on how we apply such disciplines that to not distinguish the sources of self-defense in the same way seems - bad. Sensei from the military in the late fifties and especially the early sixties had a strong influence on how the systems and styles were taught setting us all off on the wrong foot. 

In her article she then compares the same quote above but replaces military with law enforcement and she hits that on the head as well, both the military and law enforcement have totally different perspectives toward training, practice and application of force not for self-defense but more toward a defense/offense way of handling bad situations in the line of duty. Military have a totally different mind-set for combat, war, and their Rules of Engagement, etc.

In fact, mostly due to its popularity, many of the military services adopted karate and martial arts for their hand-to-hand training programs, i.e., like the USMCMAP or United States Marine Corps Martial Arts Program. Even there, it was once stated that the nature of that program was more about training the Marines mind-set to overcome the more normal and human resistance toward facing others in combat, especially up and close. 

I am not a law enforcement officer but many of the trainers and programs researched take a completely different side to training officers to handle conflict and violence in the streets. First, they are mandated by law to act while civilians in self-defense are not mandated to act and are judges accordingly (note: it is more complex than this so do the research). 

Self-Defense has domains created by the instructors/teachers according to their backgrounds and experiences such as Krav Maga, a system promoted as a deadly Israeli martial art for self-defense - kind of an oxymoronic selling point but since most are conditioned by movies, etc., not to far a stretch to gain members. 

Then there are those who compete in the sports side of karate and martial arts. As I have learned and understand from my study of professionals who teach and write on violence, sports is not self-defense and even tho it is very cool some of the best competitors endure some seemingly tough and rough competitions that is NOT self-defense. 

Last is the domain of a more philosophical way of training and practice more toward self-development, etc., where teachers put in self-defense as an after thought that is based on movies, television, games, sports and military/law enforcement influences both experienced and stolen from references materials on the Internet and in publications, etc.

Self-Defense Domains are also important, important to a critical level for those who truly and actually need self-defense. A self-defense that covers all aspects of the discipline from knowledge to actual physical applications and all the levels between (read Marc MacYoung’s, In the Name of Self-Defense for a prerequisite to this subject). 

I first studied karate and martial arts as a Marine, military service from 02/72 - 12-81, and I can tell you that a lot of what is actually self-defense was NOT taught to me and a lot of what was is not self-defense and would have resulted in my going to jail if I had used it inappropriately. It wasn’t till about ten or so years ago that I finally got exposed to what self-defense is and how to study, learn and train for it while a lot out there in SD land still have no idea the depth and breadth self-defense encompasses. We truly do live on our LUCK in this discipline!

Bibliography (Click the link)



No comments: