No preemptive attack in karate

Some see this statement as a literal. In a philosophical sense this is something one must consider but as to avoidance over action. In our modern times preemptive is not set in stone, it depends on the moments circumstances. To take a preemptive strategy does not mean the first to land a blow. In modern times to land the first blow can be perceived as an aggression over defense. 

To hold dear those precepts laid down by those who came before are a wonderful way to show proper respect but must be tempered with modern concepts of self-defense often presented by those who have the least knowledge and experience in violence. 

Once violence is on the table it is an inappropriate strategy to assume some strictly defensive posture toward actions. Simply put, often the victor is the one who applies proper tactics first. Proper tactics don’t necessarily mean those of a physical nature. Think avoidance. 

It is also necessary to to keep in mind that defense also means taking the offensive. When necessary taking an offensive act is required to achieve a means to move away from the attack and find safety and security. 

Sometimes waiting to act in accordance to the circumstances puts a person at a disadvantage requiring they act according to what they perceive could lead to a violent attack and so forth. I don’t want to wait until hot falling sparks are falling on me to avoid and defend against the heat they bring. Again, avoidance seems prudent as a defense strategy. 

This just high lites the need to recognize that what the ancients defined as self-defense has changed drastically as times changed. What constituted self-defense in the 1600’s to 1800’s are not relevant to what defines self-defense in the 21st century - modern times. 

Lofty ideals without common sense, adequate prudence and reality tend to do more damage than good.